1. Gov. Conf.
30/1
உ
Trs. memorial signed by 552 officers.
The Petitioners make out quite a good
case, but I think there can be no question of going
back on the S. of S's previous decision, which
was justified on three grounds: -
(i) Existing salaries were based on
(ii)
recommendations made by the Salaries
Commission at a time when the exchange
was at 2/-. With exchange at 1/-
conditions have completely changed:
is not merely a case of dividing or
multiplying by 2.
On a falling exchange there is a lag
in the rise in dollar prices. Cost-
of-living rises more slowly than the
it
dollar falls. (Added to this is the fact
that world gold-prices have fallen
rapidly throughout the last year, a
movement preumably reflected in their
silver equivalent.)
(iii)
This is undoubtedly a time of financial
difficulty and a special sacrifice on the
part of civil servants is reasonably
called for. Business houses ought to call
for similar sacrifices from their staffs
and it is probable that this has in fact
happened. In any case Noblesse oblige!
It may before long be necessary to reconsider
the position described at (ii) above. The exchange
appears to have stopped falling: if that condition
is maintained the cost-of-living "lag" may disappear.
The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.